With less than 2 weeks until the election, nationwide the pundits are predicting victory for the GOP. The Senate Majority is likely to flip to being controlled by the Republicans, and here in Colorado the GOP leads in the polls in several key races: the senate race, the governorship, and key House of Representative races. President Obama’s approval ratings have been dismal, sitting at about 40%. The election has become less about the issues in the country and more of a referendum on President Obama. The GOP don’t have to have a proactive campaign when all they have to do is tie Democrat incumbents to the unpopular President. And this has been done ad nauseam in this election season.
Cory Gardner has run a “successful” campaign by linking Mark Udall’s voting record to President Obama’s agenda. This tactic is clearly based on the statistics on Midterm elections. In the sixth year of a President’s term, his/her political party loses. The statistics show it. Which is why I am having a hard time sustaining hope in this political climate. But I am more interested in the long-game anyway. While the GOP may win, and win big in November, I still believe there is much evidence to suggest that they are still losing the long game, and losing it nationwide. It is easy rhetoric for the GOP in this election to simply tie candidates nationwide to an unpopular President. But are they actually suggesting any alternatives? Do they have any cogent policy suggestions on how to move the country forward? I don’t see how they can win the Presidency in 2016 without a real vision for the country.
In fact, I think Hillary Clinton already has the election basically in the bag, and she hasn’t even formally announced that she is running yet. None of the speculated crop of GOP presidential candidates will have any remote chance of beating her. All of the polls in Iowa and New Hampshire show Hillary well ahead in the polls when matched against any of the GOP candidates (Chris Christie, Rand Paul, Jeb Bush, et al.) None of the metrics I have seen show that the GOP can win nationwide popular votes when they refuse to shift stances on the issues of the times. The GOP adamantly refuse to vote for immigration reform, raising the minimum wage, continue to support anti-women policies that infringe upon their reproductive rights, or reform on student loan interest rates. So, while the Democrats may lose in the short term, I doubt that the trend holds for too long. In 2016 and beyond we are likely to see reversals in these trends.
In addition to the Democrats inherent uphill battle this election season, I am also immensely frustrated by the local newspaper media piling on. I am alluding of course to the Denver Post and their recent endorsements of Cory Gardner and also Mike Coffman. The Denver Post usually endorses Democrats and liberal candidates, and I find it very fishy that all of a sudden this newspaper is endorsing these very socially conservative candidates. The timing is odd as well. The Denver Post is currently up for sale. And it’s current owners are a hedge fund. It seems to me that these endorsements have more to do with the owner of the Post and the prospective sale of the paper than the collective opinion of its journalists. There has been a sizable outcry against the Denver Post since these endorsements, with everyone from Gary Hart to others speaking out against it. The Denver Post said in its endorsement of Cory Gardner that the gridlock in Washington D.C. needs to stop, so they endorsed Gardner because he will be a new Senator, versus Udall who has been in the Senate for 15 years. This is the most pathetic logic I have ever heard for an endorsement. Cory Gardner has served in Congress for a few years in the House of Representatives and he has been one of the obstructionists who have caused the gridlock. In fact, he did not do much to stand up to his party during the Government Shutdown of 2013, when Colorado desperately needed a functioning federal government to provide emergency funding for Colorado during our devastating 2013 thousand year flood. It really boils my blood that just one year after all of the outrage over the government shutdown, the citizens of Colorado have already forgotten about it. Voter amnesia at it’s finest. And if the Denver Post was really serious about supporting candidates who will change the gridlock in D.C., they should have endorsed Andrew Romanoff for Colorado’s 6th district. Instead, they endorsed a well-known Birther and obstructionist, Mike Coffman. The Denver Post has no credibility anymore. It’s just another corporate agenda by the oligarchy.
NEVER POLITICS 2014 POLITICAL CANDIDATE AND BALLOT MEASURE ENDORSEMENTS:
Senator: Mark Udall
Governor: John Hickenlooper/Joe Garcia
Congressmen (6th District): Andrew Romanoff
Secretary of State: Joe Neguse
State Treasurer: Betsy Markey
Attorney General: Don Quick
State Representative, District 37: Nancy Cronk
Amendment 67: VOTE NO.
Amendment 68: VOTE YES.
Proposition 104: VOTE YES.
Proposition 105: VOTE YES.